So, homemade smut is just like you would expect it to be. The genre is popular and getting even more so, as the public increasingly wants to see actual amateurs in action, rather than professionals whose onscreen antics have grown stale and repetitive.
And as homemade smut has gotten better quality-wise, more and more sites have opted to focus on that genre only. Of course, you can always find homemade smut on the likes of Reddit, Pornhub, and XVideos, but nothing can beat taking your one-eyed snake to a site that deals in nothing but the hottest homemade porn on the planet, and loads of these sites will be covered sooner or later by yours truly in proper PornGuy style!
Made porno gay amateur porn!
For real, most homemade porn sites have tons of categories and these tend to be content-packed. And the amount of amateur porn released these days means most of these sites enjoy daily updates, with new stuff getting crammed in on the double and this new stuff tend to be better than the ones you were fapping to just yesterday, showcasing increasingly sophisticated techniques, but retaining that smoky amateur flavor that makes cum eruptions inevitable! Oh, the wonders of technology!
Well, you could say I am trustworthy as fuck just because I am the PornGuy and I happen to breathe, eat and live porn sites. Yeah, all porn sites and not just homemade ones endlessly fascinate me and I can spend hours delightedly roving through the offerings of this and that porn site, eagerly marking areas of interest, things that need improvement, and stuff that needs to be applauded.
For sure I do. See, first of all, you need to note that the internet never forgets. That means you better not even think of shooting and releasing a homemade porn clip unless you are very okay with people wanking to it forever. And once a clip is released, getting it deleted from the net is almost impossible, mostly because folks like me with a homemade fetish make a point of downloading stuff and periodically uploading it just because we can.
There are also tons of homemade porn clips out there, going back nearly a hundred years if not more and marking out a niche for yourself will be one of the hardest things you will ever do. So it would be best not to go into the homemade clip sector with the mindset of becoming the top dog on the morrow. Just do the best you can with the best-looking partner(s) you can find and see what follows. And be prepared to change location if you release a homemade porn clip that folks in your area for religious and other reasons have an aversion to.
Gay pornography is the representation of sexual activity between males. Its primary goal is sexual arousal in its audience. Softcore gay pornography also exists; which at one time constituted the genre, and may be produced as beefcake pornography directed toward heterosexual female, homosexual male and bisexual audiences of any gender.[1]
Homoerotic art and artifacts have a long history, reaching back to Greek antiquity. Every medium has been used to represent sexual acts between men. However, gay pornography in contemporary mass media is mostly concentrated in the making of home videos (including DVDs), cable broadcast and emerging video on demand and wireless markets, as well as images and movies for viewing on the Internet. (For printed gay erotica, see gay pulp fiction).
However, hardcore pornographic motion pictures (stag films, as they were called prior to their legalization in 1970) were produced relatively early in the history of film. The first known pornographic film appears to have been made in Europe in 1908. The earliest known film to depict hardcore gay (and bisexual) sexual activity was the French film Le ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly, produced and released in 1920.[8] Most historians consider the first American stag film to be A Free Ride,[9] produced and released in 1915.[10][11] In the United States, however, hardcore gay sexual activity did not make it onto film until 1929's The Surprise of a Knight.[12][13][14][15] Other American examples include A Stiff Game from the early 1930s, which features interracial homosexual acts as part of its plot, and Three Comrades (1950s), which features exclusively homosexual activity.[16]
Legal restrictions meant that early hardcore gay pornography was underground and that commercially available gay pornography primarily consisted of pictures of individual men either fully naked or wearing a G-string. Pornography in the 1940s and 1950s focused on athletic men or bodybuilders in statuesque poses. They were generally young, muscular, and with little or no visible body hair. These pictures were sold in physique magazines, also known as beefcake magazines, allowing the reader to pass as a fitness enthusiast.
The Athletic Model Guild (AMG), founded by photographer Bob Mizer in 1945 in Los Angeles, was arguably the first studio to commercially produce material specifically for gay men and published the first magazine known as Physique Pictorial in 1951. Tom of Finland drawings are featured in many issues.[17] Mizer produced about a million images, and thousands of films and videos before he died on May 12, 1992. During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the advent of 16 mm film cameras enabled these photographers to produce underground movies of gay sex, male masturbation, or both. Sales of these products were either by mail-order or through more discreet channels. Some of the early gay pornographers would travel around the country selling their photographs and films out of their hotel rooms, with advertising only through word of mouth and magazine ads.
The 1960s were also a period where many underground art-film makers integrated suggestive or overtly gay content in their work. Kenneth Anger's Scorpio Rising (1963), Andy Warhol's Blow Job (1963) and My Hustler (1965), or Paul Morrissey's Flesh (1968) are examples of experimental films that are known to have influenced further gay pornographic films with their formal qualities and narratives. Also of note is Joe Dallesandro, who acted in hardcore gay pornographic films in his early 20s,[13] posed nude for Francesco Scavullo, Bruce of L.A. and Bob Mizer, and later acted for Warhol in films such as Flesh. Dallesandro was well-known to the public. In 1969 Time called him one of the most beautiful people of the 1960s, and he appeared on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine in April 1971.[18] Dallesandro also appeared on the cover of The Smiths' eponymous debut album, The Smiths.
During the 1960s, a series of United States Supreme Court rulings created a more liberalized legal environment that allowed the commercialization of pornography. MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day[19] was the first decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that magazines consisting largely of photographs of nude or near-nude male models are not obscene within the meaning of 1461. It was the first case in which the Court engaged in plenary review of a Post Office Department order holding obscene matter "nonmailable."[20] The case is notable for its ruling that photographs of nude men are not obscene, an implication which opened up the U.S. Postal Service to nude male pornographic magazines, especially those catering to gay men.[14]
Wakefield Poole's Boys in the Sand, starring Casey Donovan, was the first gay pornographic feature film, along with the works of filmmakers such as Pat Rocco and the Park Theatre, Los Angeles, California, circa 1970. In fact, it was the first pornographic feature film of any sort. Boys in the Sand opened in a theater in New York City in December 1971 and played to a packed house with record-breaking box office receipts, preceding Deep Throat, the first commercial straight pornography film in America, which opened in June 1972. This success launched gay pornographic film as a popular phenomenon.[13]
The production of gay pornography films expanded during the 1970s. A few studios released films for the growing number of gay adult movie theaters, where men could also have sexual encounters. Often, the films reflected the sexual liberation that gay men were experiencing at the time, depicting the numerous public spaces where men engaged in sex: bathhouses, sex clubs, beaches, etc.
From 1970 to 1985, commercial gay pornography was just getting set up to become the large industry that it is today.[21] Because it was in the fledgling stage, it recruited actors from the only network it had access to: the gay community.[21] Even among members of the gay community, people willing to act in gay porn were hard to come by due to the social stigma and implicated social risk of being publicly out.[21]
The 1980s were a period of transition for gay pornography film. The proliferation of VCRs made pornography videos easily accessible, and, as their prices fell, the market for home videos aimed at adult viewers became more and more lucrative. By the mid-1980s, the standard was to release pornography movies directly on video, which meant the wide disappearance of pornography theaters. Furthermore, video recording being more affordable, a multitude of producers entered the market, making low-budget pornography videos.
This shift from watching pornography as a public activity to doing so in private was also influenced by the discovery of HIV and the subsequent AIDS crisis. Public spaces for sex, such as theaters, became less attended when in the early 1980s it became a much riskier behavior. Masturbatory activities in the privacy of the home became a safe sex practice in the midst of this health crisis.
Major directors such as Matt Sterling, Eric Peterson, John Travis, and William Higgins set the standard for the models of the decade. The performers they cast were especially young, usually appearing to be around the ages of 22 or 23. Their bodies were slender and hairless, of the "swimmer's build" type, which contrasted with the older, bigger, and hairier man of the 1970s' gay pornography. Performer roles also evolved into the tight divisions of tops and bottoms. The top in anal sex is the penetrating partner, who, in these films, typically has a more muscular body and the larger penis. The bottom, or receiver of anal sex, in the films, is often smaller and sometimes more effeminate. The stars of the decade were almost always tops, while the bottoms were interchangeable (with the exception of Joey Stefano, a popular star, who was more of a bottom.) 2ff7e9595c
Comments